Advocates Concerned WQCC Decision to Allow Oil & Gas Waste Discharge Puts New Mexicans at Risk
Organization Press Release – From New Energy Economy, Center for Biological Diversity, and WildEarth Guardians.
“New Mexicans deserve at least the same regulatory protections as Texans.” – New Energy Economy Executive Director, Mariel Nanasi.
Santa Fe, NM – On Wednesday, the New Mexico Water Quality Control Commission (WQCC) ended deliberations on proposed wastewater reuse rules (WQCC 23-84) to govern the treatment and reuse of oil and gas liquid waste.
The Commissioners listened to the expert testimony last fall detailing the toxicity and risks of treatment and discharge of “produced water” – the toxic byproduct of oil and gas extraction – and opted to authorize treatment and reuse of produced water to “pilot projects” that process less than 2,000 gallons per day.
Authorization for reuse in larger “demonstration” and “industrial” projects was rejected, with the caveat that this rule will sunset after five years.
The Commissioners’ decision to allow these pilot projects to obtain permits to discharge treated waste to groundwater, however, ignores the lack of scientific evidence supporting the safety or efficacy of treatment and NMED’s own recommendations to strictly prohibit discharge.
“The science is clear—produced water is hazardous and must be treated as such. Without full chemical disclosure and rigorous standards, our precious water resources are at risk. We need safeguards based on science, not corporate influence.” – Tim Davis, Staff Attorney at WildEarth Guardians.
Standards specific to produced water treatment and quality have not yet been developed because effective treatment has not yet been proven at scale and the contents of produced water have not yet been fully characterized.
This puts NMED in the position of authorizing or denying discharge permits without any specific standards to determine efficacy of treatment or safety of the treated waste being produced. A mistake could mean catastrophic contamination of aquifers and land impacted by this authorized discharge.
The Commission also decided to ignore the straightforward language of the Produced Water Act (70-13-4 D NMSA), which requires that:
“For uses regulated by the water quality control commission pursuant to the Water Quality Act, a person shall obtain a permit from the department of environment before using the produced water, the recycled or treated water or treated product or any byproduct of the produced water.” (Emphasis added)
Instead, an illegal and inadequate “Produced Water Notice of Intent” procedure was outlined for any pilot projects authorized, including so called “closed loop” projects.
The Notice of Intent process outlined includes notification to adjacent property owners but provides no recourse for those property owners to formally object or request a hearing on any proposed project that doesn’t anticipate discharge.
During hearings last fall, however, NMED experts testified that so called “closed loop” projects are “not necessarily no discharge.” (WQCC 23-84, 5/16/24, Fullam, at 77.)
The Commission’s decision on this issue is contrary to the legislature’s intent and the letter of the law.
Further, the Notice of Intent procedure does not include any provision authorizing NMED to deny a proposal so long as an applicant includes all required information.
At last fall’s hearings, New Mexico Oil and Gas Association expert witness Mr. Rick McCurdy, the Vice President of Innovation and Sustainability for Select Water Solutions, revealed that regulators in Texas have adopted a permit process for produced water reuse projects that is significantly more protective than the rule Commissioners are planning to adopt.
Texas regulations include public notice, limitations on size, detailed requirements for testing of fluids and soil before and after treatment, characterization of naturally occurring radioactivity, worker protections, financial assurances, and – importantly – authority to reject or modify a permit application to protect public health and the environment.
Community Advocates, Water Protectors, and Environmental Groups Demand Accountability and Due Process to Protect Public Health and the Environment
Community advocates, water protectors and environmental groups are calling for a rule that includes the necessary safeguards afforded by a legally required permit process, based on scientific treatment standards, and a clear answer on the issue of jurisdiction and disposal of the hazardous waste generated during treatment processes – an issue that was glossed over and left unanswered during deliberations.
Since the passage of the 2019 Produced Water Act, the oil and gas industry has been hellbent on offloading its waste onto New Mexicans.
As traditional disposal methods of injection wells cause earthquakes and rapidly fill disposal capacity, the industry is desperate to find new ways to dump its hazardous byproduct.
It was made clear during the WQCC’s deliberations that the intent is to gradually expand upon the adopted rule, as soon as can be justified, to allow for industry to do just that — at the expense of public health, clean water, and accountability.
The Commissioners will review all of their proposed decisions and changes prior to their next meeting in May, where a final vote to adopt the rule will be taken.
“The Commission recognized the risks and dangers posed by produced water reuse and limited that reuse to pilot projects only. However, adopting a “notice of intent” process for produced water pilot projects is plain error and runs afoul of the explicit legislative requirement for a permit for any use of produced water off the oil field,” said Mariel Nanasi, Executive Director of New Energy Economy. “New Mexicans deserve at least the same regulatory protections as Texans.”
“Thankfully, the oil and gas industry lost its reckless bid to dump toxic waste onto our crops and into our rivers, for now,” said Colin Cox of the Center for Biological Diversity. “But they will keep trying to make their waste our problem.”
Tim Davis, Staff Attorney at WildEarth Guardians said, “The science is clear—produced water is hazardous and must be treated as such. Without full chemical disclosure and rigorous standards, our precious water resources are at risk. We need safeguards based on science, not corporate influence.”
NOTE: The Candle publishes press/media releases from advocacy organizations and government agencies that in our editorial opinion are helpful for the reporting and discussion of matters impacting the lives of the general public. Those that are published are identified as an organization or agency press release and are generally published as submitted and headlines are sometimes adjusted/edited for formatting, etc.
About The Author
